![]() |
||||
|
The Design of Academic Programs
|
II. Academic DepartmentsIIA. Establishing or Renaming an Academic Department Related documents cited in this section (will open in a new browser window):
The required on-campus steps include review by APAC, by the Senate PCC Committee, and by the Senate. There is no specific format required for the necessary documentation. Issues that will arise when a new department is proposed will include the academic maturity of the programs offered, national norms for the existence of similar departments, and the adequacy of available resources. Issues that will arise in relation either to a proposed new department or to a proposed new name will include potential conflict with the mission or the name of existing departments and programs. Upon Senate approval, and if he concurs, the President sends the proposal to the Chancellor. Although formal approval by the Board of Regents is required, the Board has delegated its approval authority to the Chancellor. This is pro-forma in most cases. In potentially contentious cases the Chancellor is likely to consult with the Board before acting. IIB. Merging or Splitting Academic Departments Related documents cited in this section (will open in a new browser window):
The required steps are the same as described in IIA above. However, the proposal must respond to questions concerning the tenure home of affected faculty, the unit that will be responsible for offering affected academic programs, the unit affiliation of affected staff, and the advising and support arrangements for affected students. All members of the department(s) involved must have the opportunity to vote on the action, and the votes must be reported in the proposal. In particular, when departments are to be split, each tenure track faculty member will be allowed to choose the department that will become his or her tenure home, and appropriate budget arrangements will be made to enable this choice. Related documents cited in this section (will open in a new browser window):
A proposal to close an academic department may be non-adversarial, arising from a College as part of a planned reconfiguration of its academic structure. In that case, the considerations of Section IIB apply. A proposal to close down an academic department may also be adversarial, imposed upon the Department or College by the Office of Academic Affairs, based on programmatic, quality, or fiscal considerations. In this case, special discontinuation procedures have been established allowing for full participation by the campus community in the decision. No specific formats are required for the extensive documentation needed in these cases.
|
|||
|
Office of the Associate Provost for Academic Planning & Programs |
|||